
Received January 12, 2021 / Approved May, 03 2021 Pages: 71-87
eISSN: 2600-5743
Centro Sur Vol. 5 No. 3 - July September
Conclusions
In the Educational Unit there are enough resources to implement a
module for the use of virtual learning environments for the
development of mathematical logical thinking. Students do not submit
homework because they do not have a place to do research and do not
give importance to the work submitted. The authorities of the
educational unit do not take steps to obtain resources for the
implementation of a module for the use of virtual learning
environments for the development of mathematical logical thinking.
Classes are routine, focused on the orthodox and are not encouraged
through didactic material for the area of mathematics, such as virtual
environments. With the analysis of Latin America, it can be observed
that teachers who teach mathematics classes are transmitted through
a routine system which does not allow students to develop
mathematical logical thinking. Students feel motivated when they hear
that their mathematics classes will be applied through virtual
environments, allowing the teacher a better teaching and therefore a
good learning.
References
Abreu, O., Rhea, S., Arciniegas, G., & Rosero, M. (2018). Object of
Study of Didactics: Historical Epistemological and Critical
Analysis of the Concept. Formación Universitaria, 11(6), 75-82.
https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-50062018000600075.
https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-50062018000600075
Aparicio, P. C., Blanco, N., Alvarado, M. E., Brien, Kyoung, H.,
Glenmaye, L., Yoon, D. P., Chakrabarti, B., Christensen, C. M.,
Eyring, H., Craney, C., Mckay, T., Mazzeo, A., Morris, J.,
Prigodich, C., Groot, R., Denofrio, L. A., Russell, B. S., Lopatto,
D., ... Prada, Á. R. (2005). Educación y jóvenes en conte.
Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 17(2), 1
citation_lastpage=35,2-229.
https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/2654/265425848014.pdf.
Barros Bastidas, C., & Turpo Gebera, O. (2018). Factors influencing
the scientific production of university professors: a systematic