
Centro Sur. Social Science Journal. eISSN: 2600-5743. April - June Vol. 5 No. 2 - 2021
http://centrosureditorial.com/index.php/revista
congregational activities as an institutional organization (Plant & Sherman, 2001). On
the other hand, religiosity is also defined as the personal meaning that individuals
attribute to a particular system of beliefs, values, rules of conduct and rituals (Mickey,
Soeken & Belcher, 1992). Meanwhile, spirituality relates more to an individual and
private experience with "the sacred" that suggests a sense of transcendence and may
or may not be embedded within a particular religious tradition (Breitbart, 2005).
Additionally, spirituality is shown to be a felt connection to a non-mental, non-
emotional, and non-physical aspect of the self (Hiatt, 1986), which includes elements
of meaning, purpose, and connection to a Higher Power or something greater than the
self (Targ & Levine 2002). Some authors have divided spirituality into two factors:
intrinsic and extrinsic, with the intrinsic factor originating from within the person, while
extrinsic factors are seen outside the person (Donahue, 1985) and (Allport, 1967).
After reading the articles, extracting and analyzing the relevant information to answer
the guiding question, the data were organized into two categories: positive or negative
CRS use in diagnosed patients and by survivors.
R.1. Use of positive CRS in diagnosed patients.
Religiosity in women diagnosed with breast cancer is expressed in most cases as a
coping resource towards the disease (religious coping). That is, in a more functional
sense in terms of subjective well-being, but not as the underlying structure that governs
their daily actions based on religious norms and values (Mickley, Soeken & Belcher
(1992). Thus, faith and religiosity are coping tools in women with breast cancer (Feher,
& Maly, 1999). This coincides with the findings reported by Cotton, Levine, Fitzpatric,
Dolda, & Targ (1999) where it was evidenced that spiritual well-being and quality of life
have a positive correlation and that it is related to five psychological adjustment styles
(fighting spirit, helplessness/hopelessness, fatalism, anxious preoccupation and
cognitive avoidance), clarifying the intimate relationship between psychological
adjustment and spirituality. In addition, a strong relationship between spiritual well-
being and quality of life was evidenced, resulting in an associated increase in physical,
emotional and functional well-being (Morgan, Gaston-Johansson & Mock, (2006).
Likewise, Barboza, & Forero-Forero (2011) observed a tendency, in women with breast
cancer, to be more spiritual/religious than those without breast cancer. They reported
a greater commitment to belief in god and a sense of responsibility to try to alleviate
suffering in the world. Thus, Gall, Charbonneau, & Florack (2011) have concluded that
various aspects of religiosity/spirituality have different positive implications for the
experience of breast cancer perception, growth, and clinical follow-up.
For example, some women use spirituality/religiosity as a coping resource (Lagman,
Yoo, Levine, Donnell, & Lim, 2012), with prayer being the most commonly used