
Received June 14, 2021 / Approved October, 23 2021 Pages: 17-31
eISSN: 2600-5743
Centro Sur Vol. 6 No. 3- July - September
the second feature of everyday life not only explains the subject, but
the subject's relationship and mastery, both with himself, and with the
other in the context of the relationship, this means that the subject
understands himself only in the relationship with another person
similar to him.
Therefore, once the intersubjective field in which the subject is located
has been explored, it is also important to understand his relationship
with others and with himself. As Laing (2015) said, the subject will
eventually speak from his experience and produce a feeling and
thinking based on his experience, as well as beliefs and needs (Munné
and Codina, 2002), through a relational discourse based on
confirmation and relational positions.
The personal discourse, according to Längle and Kwee (2013), is based
on the experience built in the affectation with the intersubjective field,
which manifests itself in emotions, as a guide of what is valuable
(Weixel, 2017), in thinking, as Sotolongo and Atwood (2014) point out,
the position of the subject before the intersubjective field, of what he
assumes there and in the interaction with the other, as well as
believing, as Munné and Codina (2002) state, are the biases or
prejudices before the personal meanings of acting with the other,
finally, wanting is oriented to the projection, the value and the risk that
the subject has before the situations that occur in the interaction
(Längle and Kwee, 2013).
In the subject's experience, he builds his story, changing it or
sedimenting it (Spinelli, 2007), all this can occur in the constant
dialogic exchange with the other, assuming roles, functions and
interacting with his own and the other's behavior. But this necessary
relationship presents confirmations and relational positions.
For Laing (2015) confirmation is the way in which the subject captures
the response of the other to one's own behavior, in an action of
evaluation according to one's own experience and expectation that one
has in the situation, therefore two forms can be distinguished, the
concordant or the discordant. For Honneth (2018) in these two forms
that act as counteracts there are different spheres, at the level of social
relations such as work, school, religion, the city, among others, there
the subject seeks recognition, to achieve a status, a merit for his acts,
that would be the concordance of the other in the confirmation, but
discordance can be presented, when the subject perceives humiliation
and rejection in front of what he is or performs.