https://doi.org/10.37955/cs.v7i3.326

Received April 01, 2022 / Approved June 11 2023 Pages: 144-164

eISSN: 2600-5743

Evolution of the concept of history:

a critical and comparative analysis.

Evolución del concepto de historia: un análisis crítico y

comparativo

Edri Alexander Crespo Jama

Unidad Educativa Particular Bilingüe Abdón Calderón

Universidad de Guayaquil

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0400-6672

ABSTRACT

This scholarly article investigates the evolution of the concept of

history and its influence on the discipline of history. It begins with the

medieval view of history as a source of moral lessons and progresses

to Renaissance historicism, which emphasizes the contextual

understanding of the past. It then explores the historical positivism of

modernity, which seeks universal patterns and laws in history,

followed by Marxist historical dialectics, which interprets the past as a

class struggle. Subsequently, contemporary perspectives, such as

cultural history, gender approaches, and global history, which broaden

the understanding of history through new lenses, are addressed. In

addition, the impact of digital technologies on the historical discipline

is examined. A critical review of the various historical perspectives is

undertaken, highlighting their contributions and limitations. This

article underscores the importance of ongoing critical revision in the

historical discipline to maintain its relevance and to consider ethical

and political issues in historical narrative.

Centro Sur Vol. 7 No. 4- October - December – Revista Centro Sur - eISSN: 2600-5743

145

Received April 01, 2022 / Approved June 11 2023 Pages: 144-164

eISSN: 2600-5743

Centro Sur Vol. 7 No. 4 - October - December

RESUMEN

Este artículo científico investiga la evolución del concepto de historia

y su influencia en la disciplina histórica. Comienza con la visión

medieval de la historia como fuente de lecciones morales y avanza

hacia el historicismo renacentista que enfatiza la comprensión

contextual del pasado. Luego, explora el positivismo histórico de la

modernidad, que busca patrones y leyes universales en la historia,

seguido de la dialéctica histórica marxista, que interpreta el pasado

como una lucha de clases. Posteriormente, se abordan las perspectivas

contemporáneas, como la historia cultural, los enfoques de género y la

historia global, que amplían la comprensión de la historia a través de

nuevas lentes. Además, se examina el impacto de las tecnologías

digitales en la disciplina histórica. Se realiza una revisión crítica de las

diversas perspectivas históricas, destacando sus contribuciones y

limitaciones. Este artículo subraya la importancia de la revisión crítica

continua en la disciplina histórica para mantener su relevancia y

considerar cuestiones éticas y políticas en la narración histórica.

Keywords / Keywords

History - Concept - Evolution - Education

Historia – Concepto – Evolución – Educación

Introduction

Understanding the past and the way we construct historical narratives

have been crucial aspects for humanity throughout history. The way

we conceive of the past not only influences how we interpret the

present, but also determines how we project ourselves into the future.

The concept of history, as a constantly evolving intellectual and

cultural construct, has been shaped by a wide range of influences, from

philosophy and religion to changing intellectual currents and

technological advances.

Pagès Joan (2006) stresses the importance of comparing the way

history is taught. The scientific character of history resides as much in

the valuation of differences as in that of similarities. Comparison

makes it possible to establish relationships between different

historical and cultural contexts, and helps to better understand the

past.

146

Received April 01, 2022 / Approved June 11 2023 Pages: 144-164

eISSN: 2600-5743

Centro Sur Vol. 7 No. 4 - October - December

History, as a discipline and as a narrative, plays a central role in the

construction of cultural identity, in the formation of political

ideologies and in the way we understand our relationship with our

environment and with others.

Campillo (2016) describes history in an analogical way as the

ascertainment of what happened, the narration of what was

ascertained, implying that history is the same from its ascertainment

in the facts as the facts themselves, but that they are deviated by

thoughts outside the story.

The study of the evolution of the concept of history is not only crucial

for historians and scholars, but also for the general public.

Understanding how different cultures and historical moments have

conceived and represented the past helps us to contextualize

contemporary interpretations and reflect on the construction of

historical reality. Furthermore, this critical exploration allows us to

question our own assertions when dealing with the past and to

highlight the relevance of constant reflection in historical narrative.

In this context, the fundamental questions that guide this article arise:

how has the concept of history evolved over time, what are the main

theories and approaches that have influenced its development?

It also aims to answer these questions, bearing in mind the objectives

of exploring the different conceptions of history throughout

intellectual and philosophical history; examining how the concept of

history has been transformed in different periods and cultural

contexts; critically analyzing the most influential theories that have

shaped the conceptualization of history; comparing and contrasting

the different perspectives in terms of their view of the past, their

understanding of historical change, and their interaction with other

disciplines.

This article dives into the evolution of the concept of history, exploring

its transformation over the centuries and its impact on the

historiographical discipline and society at large in a systematic

literature review. It proposes a journey through different eras and

cultural approaches, critically analyzing the conceptions of history that

have shaped our understanding of the past and the way we transmit it.

In ancient civilizations, such as Sumerian, Egyptian, Greek and

Mesopotamian, mythical narratives played a fundamental role in the

147

Received April 01, 2022 / Approved June 11 2023 Pages: 144-164

eISSN: 2600-5743

Centro Sur Vol. 7 No. 4 - October - December

explanation of the origins of humanity and the cosmos. (Botero &

Endara, 2000).

These mythical narratives not only sought to answer fundamental

questions about the origin of the world and human existence, but also

provided a moral and ethical framework for society. Myths,

transmitted orally and then recorded in writing, forged a connection

between the past and the present, granting legitimacy to reigning

dynasties and establishing a sense of collective identity (López Saco,

2015).

Religion also played an essential role in the interpretation of the past.

In many cultures, religious accounts narrated historical events as part

of the divine will or as consequences of human actions in relation to

the sacred. Abrahamic religions, such as Judaism, Christianity and

Islam, considered the past as a manifestation of the divine plan and,

therefore, influenced the way history was understood and transmitted.

(Navarro Fuentes, 2016)

These mythical and religious narratives not only provided

explanations for the past, but also laid the foundation for the notion of

historical time. Although these narratives often did not follow a precise

chronology or employ rigorous recording methods, their influence on

the conception of the past is undeniable. These early forms of historical

narrative established a precedent for how history would be

approached and communicated in later eras (López Saco, 2015).

The influence of these mythic and religious narratives endured

throughout the ages and continues to resonate in the way

contemporary cultures interact with their past. As we move forward in

this critical and comparative analysis of the evolution of the concept of

history, it is important to recognize how these ancient roots laid the

foundation for the theories and approaches that followed in the

development of the historical discipline.

The transition from mythical and religious narratives to a more

reflective and secular understanding of the past was notably driven by

Greek and Roman philosophy in classical antiquity. In this section, we

will explore how Greek and Roman philosophers contributed to the

emerging conception of history as a more structured and analytical

field of study.

One of the first significant attempts to approach the past critically was

made by Herodotus, known as the "father of history". Herodotus

148

Received April 01, 2022 / Approved June 11 2023 Pages: 144-164

eISSN: 2600-5743

Centro Sur Vol. 7 No. 4 - October - December

strove to separate history from mythology, basing his accounts on

observation and the testimony of witnesses present at the events. His

work "Histories" focused on the narration of events and how human

actions and decisions influenced historical events. Herodotus not only

investigated the causes and effects of conflicts, but also explored the

cultural and geographical differences that shaped the ancient world

(Bellatti, 2018).

Thucydides, another influential Greek historian, took the approach to

history a step further by focusing on the causes and consequences of

historical events. His work History of the Peloponnesian War

examined in detail the underlying reasons behind the conflict,

highlighting the role of human actions and human nature in the course

of events. Thucydides emphasized the importance of analyzing the

motivations and decisions of historical actors, thus marking a

milestone in the development of critical historiography (Bellatti,

2018).

Greek philosophical influence also extended to ancient Rome. Authors

such as Cicero and Titus Livy continued the tradition of critical

historiography, seeking to understand and explain past events from a

more analytical perspective. The expansion of the Roman Empire also

played a crucial role in fostering cultural exchange and the adoption of

different historical approaches to the conquered regions.

Taken together, Greek and Roman philosophy laid the foundations for

a more rational and empirical understanding of the past. As critical

thinking and rigorous observation became essential elements of

historiography, a transition to a more objective and analytical

conception of history was established, which paved the way for later

developments in the evolution of the concept of history (Caballero

Escorcia, 2015).

The Middle Ages, a period of profound religious and cultural influence,

gave rise to a significant reinterpretation of the concept of history.

During this era, history became a vehicle for transmitting moral

lessons and religious values in a theocentric world where the Church

exerted a powerful influence (Cuellar & Rico Díaz, 2018)..

History, rather than being regarded simply as an account of past

events, was shaped by the theological and ethical worldview that

prevailed in medieval society.

149

Received April 01, 2022 / Approved June 11 2023 Pages: 144-164

eISSN: 2600-5743

Centro Sur Vol. 7 No. 4 - October - December

The theocentric mentality of the Middle Ages placed God at the center

of all things, including human history. From this perspective,

historical events were seen as part of a divine plan, where every event

and change was interpreted as manifestations of God's will. The study

of history acquired a religious purpose, and medieval historians saw

their work as a way to better understand the relationship between

humankind and God over time. (Romero Medina & Pupiales Rueda,

2013).

In the Middle Ages, history became a repository of examples for moral

and ethical instruction. Historical accounts were used as illustrations

of virtues and vices, and were presented as models to be followed or

avoided. Medieval historians reconfigured historical events to conform

to the moral lessons they sought to convey (Cuellar & Rico Díaz,

2018)..

For example, stories of heroes and martyrs could serve as examples of

sacrifice and bravery, while narratives of repentant sinners offered an

opportunity for warning against wrong ways.

Medieval chronicles and hagiographies (biographies of saints) were

common forms of historical expression during this period. Chronicles

provided narratives of past events, often connecting events to divine

will and moral purpose.

In short, the conception of history in the Middle Ages was deeply

influenced by religion and ethics. History became a pedagogical tool to

inculcate religious and moral values in a society where the Church

played a central role. Although this moral and theological view of

history largely predominated during this period, it laid the

groundwork for future developments in the conceptualization of the

historical discipline, paving the way for the more critical and analytical

approaches that would emerge in later times.

The Renaissance marked a turning point in the evolution of the

concept of history by introducing a more humanistic and empirical

approach. During this era of rediscovery and reevaluation of ancient

classical cultures, historicism emerged, an approach that promoted

research and critical analysis of historical documents and sources.

(Jaguaribe, 2002).

The Renaissance, characterized by a resurgence of interest in the

classical culture and knowledge of ancient Greece and Rome, triggered

a change in the way history was approached. Renaissance scholars,

150

Received April 01, 2022 / Approved June 11 2023 Pages: 144-164

eISSN: 2600-5743

Centro Sur Vol. 7 No. 4 - October - December

such as Petrarch and Poggio Bracciolini, sought out and collected

ancient manuscripts, which allowed for a more direct understanding

of the works of antiquity. This appreciation of classical sources

influenced a revision of history based on textual evidence and

comparison of different historical periods.

Historicism, an approach that considers that historical events and

actions must be understood in the context of their time and culture,

began to gain prominence during the Renaissance. This perspective

argues that one cannot fully understand the past without considering

the values, beliefs, and circumstances that shaped the people and

societies of the time. The humanist historian Leonardo Bruni, for

example, argued for the importance of contextual and critical

interpretation of historical sources (San Cristobal, 2010).

In the Renaissance, biographies and historical works began to focus

more on the analysis of individual actions and motivations,

contributing to the historical approach centered on human agency and

cultural context. Machiavelli, with his work "The Prince," explored the

dynamics of power and politics, challenging traditional conceptions

and fostering a more realistic approach to history (Machiavelli, 1975).

The Renaissance and historicism laid the foundations for a more

analytical and empirical approach to history. The appreciation of

original sources and the consideration of cultural and temporal

contexts provided a new perspective on how the past should be studied

and understood. These developments marked a crucial transition to

modern historiography, paving the way for the critical and

comparative approaches that would develop in later eras.

Historical positivism was developed as an extension of positivist

philosophy, which promoted the application of rigorous scientific

methods to the study of all aspects of human knowledge (Guamán

Chacha, Hernández Ramos, & Lloay Sánchez, 2020)..

In historiography, this perspective sought to find laws and regularities

governing historical development, similar to the laws of nature in the

natural sciences. Auguste Comte, one of the founders of positivism,

argued that history could also be subjected to scientific and predictable

analysis. (Segundo Espínola, 2022).

Historical positivism advocated the exhaustive collection of empirical

data and the application of quantitative methods to analyze historical

patterns. Historical positivists believed that, through this rigorous

151

Received April 01, 2022 / Approved June 11 2023 Pages: 144-164

eISSN: 2600-5743

Centro Sur Vol. 7 No. 4 - October - December

data collection and analysis, it was possible to discover universal laws

governing historical change. The idea was to find regularities in the

development of societies and institutions, which would make it

possible to predict and understand the future based on the study of the

past (Ahumada Durán, 2016).

This perspective had a significant impact on the way history was

approached, promoting a more scientific and systematic approach.

However, it also received criticism for its emphasis on generalization

and its tendency to simplify the rich complexity of historical events

(Ahumada Durán, 2016).

Despite the criticisms, historical positivism left a lasting imprint on

historiography and laid the groundwork for the development of more

eclectic and nuanced approaches to understanding historical change.

Historical positivism was a characteristic response of modernity to the

search for universal laws to explain and predict historical

development. Although this perspective had its limitations and

criticisms, it marked a key moment in the evolution of the concept of

history and its relationship with science and the empirical.

Materials and Methods

The era of modernity also witnessed the emergence of philosophical

and political approaches that had a profound impact on the conception

of history. Marxism, in particular, introduced a unique perspective on

how history unfolds through the lens of materialist dialectics.

Marxism, developed by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, proposed a

materialist and dialectical interpretation of history. According to this

perspective, history is driven by class struggle and the interaction of

productive forces and relations of production. Marx argued that the

economic base of a society determines its superstructure, including its

political and cultural institutions (Hobsbawm, 1983).

Marxist dialectics is based on the concept of contradiction and

constant change. Marx described how societies went through stages of

development, from slavery to feudalism and finally to capitalism. Each

stage contained internal contradictions that, over time, led to conflicts

and changes in power relations.

Historical materialism, a central component of Marxism, holds that

the consciousness and culture of a society are ultimately determined

152

Received April 01, 2022 / Approved June 11 2023 Pages: 144-164

eISSN: 2600-5743

Centro Sur Vol. 7 No. 4 - October - December

by the material conditions of production. This implies that changes in

economic structures lead to changes in consciousness and in the way

people perceive and understand reality (Guijarro, 2018).

Marx believed that understanding history through materialist

dialectics would reveal the underlying forces driving social change and

lead to the revolutionary transformation of capitalist society into a

classless communist society.

Marxist historical dialectics profoundly influenced historiography and

the conception of history as a process of change driven by social

contradictions. However, it has also been subject to criticism,

especially in relation to its simplification of history and its focus on the

economy as the sole driving factor. Despite the criticisms, the Marxist

historical dialectic remains an enduring influence in the critical

analysis of social and economic relations in history (Reyes Calderón,

2020). Historical dialectics in Marxism presented an alternative and

provocative vision of social change, based on class struggles and the

interaction between material forces and social structures. This

perspective challenged traditional conceptions of history and left an

enduring imprint on the way in which the evolution of the concept of

history is approached.

Results

Modernity also saw the emergence of movements that questioned and

redefined traditional historical practice. The New History, a

historiographical approach that emerged in the second half of the

twentieth century, challenged conventional narratives and sought to

broaden the understanding of history through new methodological

and thematic approaches (Sánchez Jaramillo, 2005).

Traditional history often focused on political leaders, events and

processes, neglecting broader aspects of everyday life, individual

experiences and social dynamics. The New History emerged as a

critical response to this limited perspective. Historians of the New

History argued that, to fully understand the past, it was necessary to

consider a broader range of sources and topics (Rodriguez Sanchez,

1984).

The New History introduced innovative methodological approaches,

such as social history, cultural history and microhistory. These

approaches focused on everyday life, mentalities, individual

experiences and social contexts.

153

Received April 01, 2022 / Approved June 11 2023 Pages: 144-164

eISSN: 2600-5743

Centro Sur Vol. 7 No. 4 - October - December

Social history examined power structures and relations in society,

while cultural history focused on the cultural and symbolic practices

that shaped identity and beliefs (Bellatti, 2018).

A distinctive aspect of the New History was its effort to give voice to

historically marginalized and silenced groups. The stories of women,

ethnic minorities, workers, and other groups that had been overlooked

in mainstream history began to be explored and highlighted. This

enriched the understanding of history by revealing perspectives

previously ignored (Rocha, The History of Gender and Gender in

History. Apuntes preliminares dentro del profesorado en Historia,

Universidad Nacional de La Plata, 2017)..

The New History challenged the idea of a single, linear history,

suggesting that there are multiple histories within a single period or

event. This perspective reflected the diversity of experiences and

points of view present in any historical context.

The New History marked a significant change in the way history is

approached and conceived. By broadening the range of sources,

themes and methodological approaches, this historiographical current

enriched our understanding of the past and contributed to the

evolution of the concept of history towards a more inclusive and

contextualized vision.

The era of modernity also witnessed the emergence of approaches that

questioned the objectivity and authority of traditional historical

narratives. Poststructuralist approaches and postmodern history

emerged as critical responses to conventional conceptions of history

and the quest for objective truths (Rodriguez Troiani, 2022).

Poststructuralist approaches challenged the idea that there is a single

objective and neutral truth in history. These approaches argued that

historical narratives are influenced by language, power, and

ideologies. Post-structuralist historians suggested that historical

interpretations are not mere reflections of facts, but constructions

based on the selection and interpretation of evidence (Valls, 2003).

The poststructuralist approach to deconstruction analyzes how words

and concepts acquire meanings in specific contexts. Poststructuralist

historians argued that historical meanings are inherently unstable and

can be interpreted in multiple ways. This perspective challenged the

notion of a single, established history and emphasized the multiplicity

of interpretations.

154

Received April 01, 2022 / Approved June 11 2023 Pages: 144-164

eISSN: 2600-5743

Centro Sur Vol. 7 No. 4 - October - December

Postmodern history took these criticisms to a deeper level.

Postmodern historians argued that historical narratives are inevitably

influenced by the language, ideology, and culture of the historian. This

led to a distrust of the possibility of arriving at an objective

representation of the past. In contrast, postmodern history explored

the ways in which historical narratives are constructed and how they

influence the understanding of the past.

Poststructuralist approaches and postmodern history had a profound

impact on historiography by questioning established truths and

hegemonic narratives. However, they also received criticism for their

skepticism towards any kind of historical truth and for their emphasis

on relativity and fragmentation. Despite the controversies, these

approaches contributed to a greater reflection on how historical

narratives are constructed and presented. (Cruz, 2000).

Poststructuralist approaches and postmodern history challenged the

objectivity and authority of traditional history by focusing on the

construction and interpretation of historical narratives. These

approaches led to a greater awareness of how language, power, and

ideology shape our perceptions of the past, contributing to a

continuing evolution in the conceptualization of history.

Cultural history and the turn to subjectivity.

Cultural history has emerged as an influential approach to the

discipline of history, shifting the traditional focus from political events

and social structures to human experience, everyday life, and cultural

representations. History focuses on how people experience, interpret,

and make sense of their environment and their past.

Cultural history examines cultural practices in context, including

aspects such as art, literature, music, religion and daily life. It studies

how these cultural expressions reflect and contribute to the

construction of individual and collective identities, as well as to the

dynamics of power and social change (Dino & Mora, 2017).

A distinctive feature of cultural history is its interest in subjectivity and

individual experiences. Cultural historians explore how people have

lived and felt their time, how they have interpreted and remembered

their experiences, and how they have contributed to the formation of

broader cultural narratives (Hernández, 2008).

155

Received April 01, 2022 / Approved June 11 2023 Pages: 144-164

eISSN: 2600-5743

Centro Sur Vol. 7 No. 4 - October - December

Cultural history has often been intertwined with postmodern theories

that critique hegemonic narratives and emphasize the multiplicity of

interpretations. Like postmodern history, cultural history questions

objectivity and seeks to understand how historical narratives are social

and interpretive constructions (González Rey, 2013).

Cultural history stresses the importance of context in the formation of

human experience and cultural manifestations. It examines how

people interact with their environment, how they communicate, and

how they construct meanings through these interactions.

Cultural history has enriched the conception of history by focusing on

subjectivity, human experience and cultural practices. This

contemporary approach recognizes the importance of understanding

how people make sense of their past and present, and how these

interpretations shape the construction of history.

Gender approaches and the study of history from diverse identities.

In the contemporary era, the historical approach has broadened to

include perspectives that were previously marginalized or overlooked

in the conventional historical narrative. Gendered approaches and the

study of history from diverse identities have emerged as powerful tools

for understanding how gender, sexuality, and other identities have

influenced historical experiences.

Gender approaches have challenged the traditional idea that history is

based primarily on the experiences and achievements of prominent

men. These approaches have examined how social constructions of

gender have influenced the lives of all people, and how they have

affected aspects such as politics, economics, culture, and everyday life.

They have revealed the importance of women's voices and experiences

in history and have emphasized the need to recognize and analyze

patriarchy and power dynamics (Rocha, The history of gender and

gender in history. Preliminary notes within the professorship in

History, Universidad Nacional de la Plata, 2017)..

In addition to the focus on gender, contemporary history has seen

increasing attention to other marginalized historical identities and

experiences, including those of LGBTQ+ people, ethnic minorities,

people with disabilities, women, and others. These approaches have

underscored the need to consider how intersections of gender, race,

sexual orientation, and other factors have shaped people's historical

experiences.

156

Received April 01, 2022 / Approved June 11 2023 Pages: 144-164

eISSN: 2600-5743

Centro Sur Vol. 7 No. 4 - October - December

Gendered approaches and the study of history from diverse identities

have had a profound impact on the way history is conceived. They have

challenged hegemonic narratives and demonstrated that history is

diverse and complex, and cannot be fully understood without

considering the experiences and perspectives of a variety of groups.

These approaches have broadened the scope of history, allowing for a

more complete and nuanced understanding of the past. They have

shown that people's experiences are not homogeneous, but vary

according to gender, race, sexual orientation, and other identities. By

considering these differences, the understanding of historical

processes and how they have affected diverse groups of people has

been enriched (García Peña, 2016).

Gendered approaches and the study of history from diverse identities

have revolutionized the conception of history by challenging

traditional narratives and recognizing the diversity and complexity of

human experiences. These approaches have broadened the scope of

history by including historical voices and perspectives that had

previously been marginalized or ignored, thus enriching our

understanding of the past.

Global and transnational history: transcending national borders.

In contemporary times, the conceptualization of history has evolved to

transcend the limitations of national boundaries and address the past

from a global and transnational perspective.

Global and transnational history approaches have emerged as

essential tools for understanding how events, interactions and

dynamics transcend geographical divisions.

Global history focuses on the study of interactions and connections

between different regions and cultures over time. This approach seeks

to understand how historical events and processes are intertwined in

a web of complex relationships and how influences travel across

national boundaries (Yun Casalilla, 2019).

The transnational approach focuses on the study of migrations,

cultural exchanges and connections that transcend territorial

divisions. It examines how people, ideas, technologies and goods have

circulated and influenced different contexts, shaping shared historical

processes (Acha, 2014).

157

Received April 01, 2022 / Approved June 11 2023 Pages: 144-164

eISSN: 2600-5743

Centro Sur Vol. 7 No. 4 - October - December

Global and transnational history approaches have highlighted the

interdependence of events and decisions in different parts of the

world. They have shown how changes in one region can have

significant repercussions in other areas and how decisions made in one

place can have global consequences.

One of the most notable impacts of global and transnational history

has been its challenge to historical narratives focused on a single

country or region. These approaches have highlighted how national

histories are only one part of a larger story and how it is important to

consider the global context to fully understand historical events and

processes (Zimmermann, 2017).

Global and transnational history approaches have enriched the

conception of history by transcending national boundaries and

considering global connections and influences in the unfolding of

historical events. These approaches have highlighted the

interconnectedness and interdependence of historical processes in

different parts of the world, offering a more complete and

contextualized view of the past.

New technologies and the digitization of history.

In the contemporary era, technological advancement has had a

profound impact on the way history is conceived, researched and

presented. Digitization and new technologies have revolutionized

historical practice, allowing wider access to sources and data, as well

as the creation of new ways of telling and sharing stories.

Digitization has transformed the way historians access sources and

data. Libraries and archives have digitized historical documents,

making them easily accessible online and allowing researchers to

access valuable resources from anywhere in the world. This has

expanded research possibilities and democratized access to historical

information. (Dirección de Control Escolar de la Universidad

Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, 2018)..

Digitization has enabled the creation of new ways of telling and

presenting stories. Websites, blogs, podcasts, and social media

platforms have given historians the opportunity to communicate their

research in a more accessible and engaging way to a wider audience.

The combination of images, videos, and text in digital formats has

enriched the way stories are told (Grima, 2020).

158

Received April 01, 2022 / Approved June 11 2023 Pages: 144-164

eISSN: 2600-5743

Centro Sur Vol. 7 No. 4 - October - December

New technologies have enabled interactive visualization of complex

historical data. Through graphs, interactive maps, and other visual

tools, historians can present patterns and trends in a clearer and more

accessible way. This helps researchers and the general public better

understand connections and changes over time.

While digitization has brought many advantages, it has also raised

challenges and ethical considerations. The availability of large

amounts of data online requires skills to assess the quality and

reliability of sources. In addition, issues of privacy and ownership of

historical data have also arisen in this digital environment.

Digitization and new technologies have had a transformative impact

on the conceptualization and practice of history. They have expanded

access to sources and data, created new forms of narrative and

presentation, and improved the visualization of historical patterns.

However, they also raise challenges and ethical issues that historians

must address as they make the most of these digital tools.

Critical and comparative analysis of perspectives.

Comparison of different conceptions of history.

As we explore the various conceptions of history throughout

intellectual and philosophical evolution, a comparison is essential to

understand how each approach addresses key aspects of history.

Below, we compare the different conceptions of history in terms of

their view of the past and their understanding of historical change.

History as moral and lesson (Middle Ages): sees the past as a source of

moral examples and lessons to guide behavior and conduct in the

present and future.

Historicism (Renaissance): it considers that the past is unique and

must be understood in its own cultural and temporal context, avoiding

anachronistic projections.

Historical positivism (Modernity): seeks to discover laws and patterns

in history through a scientific approach, with emphasis on objectivity

and causality.

Historical dialectics (Marxism): observes the past as a series of

conflicts and contradictions that drive social change and progress

toward a more just society.

159

Received April 01, 2022 / Approved June 11 2023 Pages: 144-164

eISSN: 2600-5743

Centro Sur Vol. 7 No. 4 - October - December

Cultural history and subjectivity: Considers the past as a series of

individual experiences and cultural manifestations that shape

constantly evolving identities and values.

Gender approaches and diversity of identities: recognizes the past as a

network of diverse experiences and cultural contexts that have been

historically excluded or ignored.

Global and transnational history: visualizes the past as a network of

global interactions that transcend national borders and contribute to

the understanding of events and processes worldwide.

Digitization and new technologies: presents the past through

multimedia and digital forms, allowing a more accessible and

attractive interaction with history.

Historical change is understood according to his approach, since he

has a unique understanding of it, whether as a result of dialectical

conflicts, universal laws, global interactions, or transformations in

subjectivity and cultural practices.

Each approach interacts differently with other disciplines such as

philosophy, sociology and anthropology. Some approaches, such as

historical positivism, seek a rigorous scientific approach, while others,

such as cultural history, focus on the interpretation and understanding

of human subjectivity.

In short, each conception of history approaches the past from a unique

perspective, focusing on different aspects and considering diverse

influences. Comparing these conceptions allows us to appreciate the

diversity of approaches in the conceptualization of history and how

each contributes to a fuller and richer understanding of the human

past.

Reflections on how these perspectives influence historiographical

practice.

Each of the perspectives discussed has a significant impact on how

historians approach the research, interpretation, and presentation of

history. These perspectives not only enrich the historical discipline,

but also pose challenges and opportunities for history professionals.

The existence of multiple perspectives in the conceptualization of

history enriches historiography by offering a variety of conceptual and

160

Received April 01, 2022 / Approved June 11 2023 Pages: 144-164

eISSN: 2600-5743

Centro Sur Vol. 7 No. 4 - October - December

methodological tools. Historians can choose the approach that best

suits their research topic and objectives, allowing for a more complete

and nuanced analysis.

Each perspective influences how history is presented. For example,

cultural history and gender approaches shift the focus from prominent

historical figures to everyday and often marginalized experiences. This

leads to the construction of more inclusive and equitable narratives.

Consideration of subjectivity in cultural history and other approaches

highlights the importance of individual experiences in shaping

historical events. This calls for greater attention to the

underrepresented and often overlooked voices in history.

Global history perspectives, gender and other identity approaches

challenge hegemonic narratives and allow for the inclusion of multiple

perspectives. This encourages the revision of history from a variety of

angles.

Digitization and new technologies allow historians to present their

work in a more accessible and attractive way to a wider audience.

However, it also requires careful consideration of the reliability of

sources and the privacy of data.

Global and transnational perspectives highlight the

interconnectedness of historical events in a global context. This

challenges the tendency to view history from a nationalistic lens and

underscores the importance of global interactions in shaping historical

processes.

Several approaches, such as cultural history and the study of identities,

place greater emphasis on human agency and the ability of people to

influence history. This challenges deterministic views of history and

highlights the importance of individual and collective decisions.

In conclusion, each perspective has a distinctive impact on

historiographical practice, influencing how sources are selected,

events are interpreted, and narratives are presented. By adopting a

variety of approaches and considering their implications, historians

can enrich their understanding of the past and contribute to a more

inclusive and accurate representation of history.

161

Received April 01, 2022 / Approved June 11 2023 Pages: 144-164

eISSN: 2600-5743

Centro Sur Vol. 7 No. 4 - October - December

Conclusions

Throughout this analysis, we have explored the evolution of the

concept of history throughout intellectual and philosophical history.

We have identified several important conceptions of history and

discussed how they have influenced historiographical practice and

understanding of the past.

The evolution of the concept of history reflects the changing and

multifaceted nature of the historical discipline. Each historical

conception represented the intellectual and cultural perspective of its

time, and contributed to the understanding and practice of history in

that specific period.

What is clear is that there is no single "correct" way of conceiving

history. Instead, these perspectives are complementary and enrich our

understanding of the past. History has become more inclusive,

contextual and diverse as it has evolved over time.

History, as a whole, is a constantly evolving discipline. Each new

perspective and approach adds additional layers to our understanding

of the past, broadening the scope and depth of the discipline. History

is not static; it adapts and renews itself as our society and our

questions about the past evolve.

Therefore, critical revision is fundamental to the historical discipline

because it allows us to question previous assumptions, methods, and

perspectives. By reflecting on how we have conceived history in the

past, we can improve and enrich our current historiographical

practice.

Historical perspectives need to be revised and updated to reflect the

increasing diversity of human experiences and the evolution of society.

Critical revision helps us to overcome historical biases and to consider

a wider range of voices and perspectives in the narrative of the past.

In addition, the historical discipline must be sensitive to the ethical

and political implications of its work. Critical review helps us to

address fundamental questions about who has the power to tell the

story and how different groups are represented in the historical

narrative.

In short, critical revision is essential to maintain the vitality and

relevance of the historical discipline. It enables us to adapt to an ever-

162

Received April 01, 2022 / Approved June 11 2023 Pages: 144-164

eISSN: 2600-5743

Centro Sur Vol. 7 No. 4 - October - December

changing world and to meet the challenges and opportunities of our

present age. History remains a dynamic and constantly evolving quest

for knowledge of the human past.

References

Acha, O. (2014). Transnational and global: critiquing the concept of

history in the face of the emergence of post-national

historiography. Ayer, 121-144.

Ahumada Durán, R. (2016). Henri Marrou's critique of historical

positivism: The return of the subject in the elaboration of

historical knowledge. Cuadernos de historia(44), 139-181.

doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0719-12432016000100006

Bellatti, I. (2018). The understanding of history and the construction

of social and cultural identities in future teachers. Barcelona:

Universitat de Barcelona. Retrieved from

http://hdl.handle.net/2445/121855

Botero, F., & Endara, L. (2000). Mito, rito, símbolo: lecturas

antropológicas. Quito, Ecuador: Instituto de Antropología

Aplicada.

Caballero Escorcia, B. A. (2015). Comparative history. A method for

doing history. Society and Discourse(28), 50-69.

doi:https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.s%20&%20d.v0i28.1434

Campillo, A. (2016). Three concepts of history. Pensamiento. Journal

De Investigación e Información Filosófica, 72(70), 37-59.

doi:https://doi.org/10.14422/pen.v72.i270.y2016.003

Cruz, J. I. (2000). Poststructuralist and ideological trends in

postmodern literary criticism. Revista de Filología de la

Universidad de La Laguna(18), 281-296.

Cuellar, S. F., & Rico Díaz, T. (2018). Life, culture and Christianity in

the Middle Ages, ideological domination yesterday and today: on

the importance of developing historical thinking in classrooms.

Folhmyp(10), 4-17. Retrieved from

https://revistas.pedagogica.edu.co/index.php/FHP/article/vie

w/8554

Dino, M., & Mora, C. (December 13, 2017). The Historian. Retrieved

from https://www.elhistoriador.com.ar/la-historia-nuevos-

enfoques-crisis-de-identidad-disciplinar/

Directorate of School Control of the Universidad Michoacana de San

Nicolás de Hidalgo (June 8, 2018). Dirección de Control Escolar.

Retrieved from http://www.dce.umich.mx/importante-el-uso-

de-nuevas-tecnologias-en-la-difusión-de-la-historia/

163

Received April 01, 2022 / Approved June 11 2023 Pages: 144-164

eISSN: 2600-5743

Centro Sur Vol. 7 No. 4 - October - December

García Peña, A. L. (2016). From women's history to gender history.

Contributions from Coatepec(31).

González Rey, F. (2013). Subjectivity in a cultural-historical

perspective: advancing on an unfinished legacy. Revista CS(11),

19-42.

Grima, M. (May 30, 2020). GRIM ACADEMY. Retrieved from

https://grimacademy.com/transformacion-

digital/digitalizacion/cuando-empezo/

Guamán Chacha, K. A., Hernández Ramos, E. L., & Lloay Sánchez, S.

I. (2020). Positivism and legal positivism. Revista Universidad

y Sociedad, 12(4), 265-269. Obtenido de

http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2218-

36202020000400265&lng=es&tlng=es

Guijarro, J. C. (2018). Historical-dialectical materialism: a critique of

its foundations. Philosophy of Economics, 7(2), 137-155.

Hernández, O. G. (2008). Subjectivity from the cultural-historical

perspective: a transition from dialectical thinking to complex

thinking. Revista colombiana de Psicología(17), 147-160.

Hobsbawm, E. J. (1983). Marxismo e historia social. Puebla: Instituto

de Ciencias de la Universidad Autónoma de Puebla.

Jaguaribe, H. (2002). Un estudio crítico e la Historia (Vol. II). Mexico,

D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica. doi:968-16-6365-9

López Saco, J. (2015). A long-suffering survival: mythical elements

and motifs in ancient Greek philosophy. El Futuro Del Pasado,

195-213. doi:https://doi.org/10.14516/fdp.2015.006.001.008

Machiavelli, N. (1975). The Prince (3rd ed.). Barcelona: Vosges.

Navarro Fuentes, C. A. (December 2016). Function and validity of

mythical narratives. En-claves del pensamiento, 10(20), 39-56.

Retrieved from

http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S

1870-879X2016000200039&lng=es&tlng=es

Pagés, J. (2006). Comparison in the teaching of history.

Clío&Asociados. La historia enseñada(9-10), 17-35.

Reyes Calderón, J. R. (2020). Karl Marx, material dialectics of history.

Hallazgos, 17(33), 163-196.

doi:https://doi.org/10.15332/2422409X.4460

Rocha, M. M. (2017). The history of gender and gender in history.

Preliminary notes within the professorship in History,

Universidad Nacional de la Plata. Clío & Asociados.

Rocha, M. M. (2017). The history of gender and gender in history.

Preliminary notes within the professorship in History,

Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Clío & Asociados(25), 86-97.

Retrieved from

164

Received April 01, 2022 / Approved June 11 2023 Pages: 144-164

eISSN: 2600-5743

Centro Sur Vol. 7 No. 4 - October - December

http://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.8627/p

r.8627.pdf

Rodríguez Sánchez, Á. (1984). La Nueva Historia. An introduction.

University of Extremadura, Servicio de Publicaciones. Retrieved

from https://dehesa.unex.es/handle/10662/7062

Rodríguez Troiani, V. (February 17, 2022). Cinco Noticias. Retrieved

from https://www.cinconoticias.com/postestructuralismo/

Romero Medina, R., & Pupiales Rueda, B. E. (2013). Leducación en el

otroño de la Edad Media. The birth of the university in the

context of medieval society. Tendencias, 14(2), 231-246.

Retrieved from

http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S

0124-86932013000200231&lng=en&tlng=es

San Cristóbal, M. (2010). Leonardo Bruni's" Isagogicon moralis

disciplinae" and its Spanish versions: edition and study.

Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid. doi:978-84-693-

3223-8.

Sánchez Jaramillo, L. F. (2005). History as a science. Latin American

Journal of Educational Studies, 1(1), 54-82. Retrieved from

https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=134116845005

Segundo Espínola, J. P. (July 29, 2022). Concepto.de. Retrieved

August 22, 2023, from Concepto.de:

https://concepto.de/positivismo/

Valls, M. R. (2003). Michel Foucault and the feminist critical

poststructuralist turn in educational research. Revista

Educación y pedagogía, 15(37), 69-83.

Yun Casalilla, B. (2019). Global history, transnational history and the

history of empires. The Atlantic, America and Europe (16th -

18th centuries). Institución Fernando el Católico.

Zimmermann, E. (2017). Introductory Study: a note on new

approaches to global and transnational history. Social Studies of

the State, 3(5).