Each article received undergoes a review and selection process. The Editorial Committee conducts an initial review, accepting or rejecting submissions based on their scientific quality, relevance to the journal, and timeliness of the results. The Committee may request modifications and make recommendations to bring the document into line with the journal's guidelines.

Articles are evaluated through a double-blind process by two external academic peers, who may decide whether to:

• Approve without changes
• Approve with minor changes without the need for re-evaluation
• Approve with major changes that require re-evaluation
• Reject the article.

If disputes arise regarding the reviewers' opinions, the Editor will resolve them or, if necessary, request a second or third review.

The anonymity of authors and reviewers is maintained throughout the process. The results of the review are communicated to the author by email, allowing them to make any necessary adjustments.

After receiving the corrected article, the journal verifies compliance with the suggestions and analyzes the justifications for any recommendations that have not been addressed. Once this phase has been completed, the article may be returned to the author for further adjustments if necessary. The review and acceptance process can take approximately four months, and receipt of the article does not guarantee its approval and automatic publication.